That's how it almost always is. Until you manage to fool yourself that you had a hard day and should reward yourself with a cigarette.For real, and the weirdest thing is that I actually don't feel the need to smoke, and I have no problems being with people who smoke near me or going out drinking also does not make me want to smoke.
Only that for me cigars were never a reward thing.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvKIWjnEPNY
That's how it almost always is. Until you manage to fool yourself that you had a hard day and should reward yourself with a cigarette.
"So we still lack any kind of evidence for abiogenesis, but here's how it could have happened!"Since we were talking about abiogenesis earlier:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdozVq81gog
Lazy eyes, sure, but quite an informative look into the last few decades of research.
It's a theory governed by hypotheses. It also happens to be scientific: it's falsifiable, testable etc. Which means it's worth studying and investigating further. And it is, currently, being investigated further.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3dGffRAHhI
"So we still lack any kind of evidence for abiogenesis, but here's how it could have happened!"
This is the part which becomes a bit like religion which I can't take.
Nowhere in the video is it said that it isn't wrong. Nowhere is it said that it's totally 100% what happened. But based on what we currently know with regards to evolution, it's the most workable theory.I tend to agree with lojique here,they might know some things,but until they manage to prove it 100% It could be wrong.
lizard eye or something?get your tinfoil hats on
rewatched "Alexander", seen it when it appeared in 2004 and thought it was awesome back then so I figured hey, let's rewatch that baby. besides being full of overt and covert homoerotic undertones (why the fuck are all these big movies filled with them?), also noticed this:
http://i.imgur.com/gjdJIky.jpg
+ http://i.imgur.com/gg7RqoQ.jpglizard eye or something?
You misunderstand theories then. Theories are explanations of how things happen. Determining whether they are correct or not is a constant process (of trying to prove them wrong), but theories don't graduate to facts when they're proven. We don't call it the germ fact or the fact of gravity. So whatever language we use when we present them is irrelevant.all I mean is that these theories are presented as fact